|
|
|
|
#676
|
||||
|
||||
|
I skip Dog to ban Andy for creating a skip ban out of a double post. The double post makes your argument null-in-void sir.
I ban Doggy for defending my untarnished reputation. *flex* |
|
#677
|
||||
|
||||
|
I ban you for thinking I think that, I'm just saying that I thought up a new skip ban and what I mean when I say skip ban. I also ban crest because my second post is what I was talking about, I skipbanned my self to ban dog, which in my language means 'I skip ban Dog'
|
|
#678
|
||||
|
||||
|
I ban Andy for having a ban that doesn't fall in with my regulations and rule book. *GASP!*
/chuckle |
|
#679
|
||||
|
||||
|
I ban Crest because she didn't write the rule book.
|
|
#680
|
||||
|
||||
|
I ban Andy for making me drag out and dust off my rule book.
|
|
#681
|
||||
|
||||
|
I ban Crest for bringing the rule book out to doom us all
|
|
#682
|
||||
|
||||
|
I ban both of you because I have the rules from the first ever game here:
Rules: You have to come up with a stupid [or good] reason to ban somebody. For example: I ban Captain Seaford because he made this thread. And you keep the chain going. You ban the person ABOVE you only! If your lazy, do it this way instead: Banned for making this thread (since it refers to the person who posted ABOVE you ONLY!!) Please note that it does not have to refer the the persons post, for example: Banned for having no signature. Everybody get it? You don't have to say the persons whole name! You can just say, "Banned for making this thread." or something like that. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Captain Seaford was these rule's writer. EDIT: AAAAAAAAAAnybody going to reply? |
|
#683
|
||||
|
||||
|
I ban andy because.... whats your point here mate? and I also ban andy for editing
|
|
#684
|
||||
|
||||
|
I ban dog for:
1. My point is to prove I didn't break the rules and Crest didn't wright them 2. I ban you because editing isn't a very good reason to ban. I also ban Crest for not standing up for 'her rules' in my eyes thats saying that they aren't her rules. EDIT: G2G Sea Ya Guys! |
|
#685
|
||||
|
||||
|
I ban andy for a few things
1. you did break the rules 2.Crest never said which rules she wrote 3. edits are completely bannable 4.you edited AGAIN 5. don't tell us good bye.. a true banner simply slips away into the shadows and reappears when the time is right. I also ban crest for not showing us the rules and pwning andy |
|
#686
|
||||
|
||||
|
I ban dog:
1. If I did you did too 2. If she didn't wright banning rules, I couldn't break her's 3. I know they Are I just don't think they're good 4. See above 5. I can say bye if I want to |
|
#687
|
||||
|
||||
|
I ban Andy for getting in an argument with a ban master about the rules!
I also ban him for thinking everybody should ban as fast as him, people have more important things to do you know, I multitask for one. |
|
#688
|
||||
|
||||
|
I ban MA because I won the arguement. Also, you shouldn't have to ban every second, just don't take Ten Minutes to reply!
|
|
#689
|
||||
|
||||
|
I ban Andy for thinking he won the argument, Crest just decided that arguing with a noobanner over the rules was not worth her time.
|
|
#690
|
||||
|
||||
|
I ban MA because that means she gave up, which is losing.
|
|
|