Let's Try This Again, Shall We?

[andyspins]

I thinl there should be a set number of times in a row you are absent before you are put in question, therefor it is based on fact, not opinion when someone is put in question because of that. Just my thinking.

[Chris Ironhawk]

Originally Posted by andyspins

I thinl there should be a set number of times in a row you are absent before you are put in question, therefor it is based on fact, not opinion when someone is put in question because of that. Just my thinking.

I think that this is a VERY good idea! I would say if you consecutively miss two meetings, and you have not posted a leave of absence thread, then your membership shall be questioned...

[Captain Del]

Originally Posted by Chris Ironhawk

I think that this is a VERY good idea! I would say if you consecutively miss two meetings, and you have not posted a leave of absence thread, then your membership shall be questioned...

That would work. 2 consecutive absences would lead to primary questioning, and then a final chance. If a guild doesn't pick themselves up by the third time in a row, then we will start to get serious.