|
Wierd, an absence of things = nothing? Can nothing exist? Does everything have to be connected into realms? I think some of this may have gotten out of hand, so let me simplify.
What I basically envision time as is something that doesn't technically exist only in the physical world. It is more of a metaphysical signature that our brains percieve through the progress of events.
In reality, time is out of reach, no one can claim to capture time or perfectly examine it directly. Time is something we really see the effects of. I understand what you mean by time is basically an illusion. In the laws of the universe, time might not really exist in the sense we believe it does; but instead its really what we think about the rate of progression in the universe.
Please understand that even things that have been called "scientific laws" for hundreds of years have been disproven as technology grows. Even things now we might see as perfectly true may be falsified in the future.
So I'm just wondering, why would you use examples such as ones given by a guy named Sir Isaac Newton, who was a strong believer in universal time?
I know the context may sound confusing, but isn't language? Have you ever explored the complex depths of language? Have you ever seen how the brain processes words through thought? Does anyone know? Of course. Does anyone know how it happens? Not really, only a few people at most. So I ask you: Who are you to know all about these mystical realms that continuously evade the eyes of scientists everywhere?
|