|
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
guild collective gm vote
this fourm is use to vote for the gm of the guild collective . they must be useing there main pirate to be gm have been or are a gm of a guild. the gm nominations so far are me and davy fireskull who has a guild and is a gm on his main pirate.
|
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
Hang on a second, we can still use our baby pirate to be the guildmaster right? Just checking.
|
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
To my understanding yes, the GM sends a baby pirate into this guild.
|
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
|
Wait, if the GM were to use their main pirate, what's the point of the guild COLLECTIVE? wouldn't it be a baby pirate representative of the guild in question? The main pirate would be lead of their guild?
|
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
|
Yes, thats what will happen. As I said before, lets try to make our pirate's name relate to our guild. I can send in The Shadow Sorceror, if Del joins he can send in a pirate named The Partner in Crime, Isaiah Ropeswine could send in someone named Eternal Warlord, etc. Just to avoid confusion. How about we all say if we want to run for GM, then we can start voting on say... Friday at midnight? (Or saturday at 12:01, whatever you like best).
|
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
the guild master of the guild collective should be the persons who is gm's main pirate. the gms of member guilds send eather a baby pirate or a represenative of there guild to the guild collective guild.
|
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
|
If that is the case, then nobody will run. Most of us cant put our main pirates as the GM because our main pirates run our guild. Perhaps this is not the best idea after all....
|
|
#8
|
||||
|
||||
|
You are understanding it wrong DF. I think that what he is saying is that The GM of the Collective should be the person who is the GM of a guild. Besides your main pirate can change on any given day. Mine was Darman, then Ordo, now is Niner.
|
|
#9
|
||||
|
||||
|
Countainer, could you please explain it clearly? Using some good grammar so that we can understand it? Im having a hard time reading your posts.
|
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
|
yes someone from the guild collective should use the pirate they use the most often be in the guild collective but not nessasaraly the gm. sorry for the confusion.
|
|
#11
|
||||
|
||||
|
Countainer, you do realize that the pirate people use most often is the guildmaster of their guild, they would have to add baby pirates so they dont leave their guild.
|
|
#12
|
||||
|
||||
|
That's pretty much what he meant...
If the GM is your most active pirate, he doesn't want you to leave your guild for the collective, rather he wants your most active non-GM pirate to lead the guild. |
|
#13
|
||||
|
||||
|
Ah.... Ok... you know what... I dont want to be the gm anymore... someone else can run.....
|
|
#14
|
||||
|
||||
|
Helga thinks this is all a very bad idea because of lack of clarity and organization. Helga says it takes a great deal of time and skill to manage, what, 500 guild members from 500 other guilds, seeing as how there are at least that many GM's? Helga also says that it would take a massive amount of work to bring them together as a majority at specific times, being as all of the pirate brethren happen to be at separate time zones. Helga says it would also be vital to have a specific website or forum, which takes even more time, because a good GM does not leave it all to the lackeys, but wants to make sure it is done right. Helga says this should be looked at as a 40 hour a week job, not a fun game of who can play Mr. Sparrow and Ms. Swann.
|
|
#15
|
||||
|
||||
|
Davy is starting to rethink this whole thing... Davy thinks that he will be a member, but doesnt want to be a guildmaster... Davy also agrees with Helga, on everything... And Davy is now mad at Helga for making him want to talk in the 3rd person! xD
|
|
|