|
Okay, the nested comments are getting a bit much. I'm going to cut and paraphrase.
"Do you work for Disney on line services, or any place in the Disney company?"
No comment.
"I would venture to guess that those of us paying for the game (you know, the adults?) would be less like to abuse the system and less likely to be griefers."
Again, this is based on nothing more than your perception of a stereotypical griefer profile. Are SOME adults less likely to be griefers? Sure. Are ALL adults less likely to be griefers? No.
"Well, no kidding? To me they would be preferable, and apparently to a lot of other people that post on these forums. "
Lots of ideas sound good (or preferable) until you get down to the brass tacks. That's when a lot of this stuff starts looking less and less workable.
"but I have done so for other games. How many private HALO, Castle Wolfenstein, Quake IV"
Problem! You're comparing a series of FPS with explicit client-configurable server functionality to a completely controlled MMO.
Apples and cashews.
"Doing one does not necessarily preclude them from doing both. "
I agree with you, in theory, but as it appears right now, yes it does.
"You don’t have to agree with those of us that would like to see this option, but there really isn’t a necessity to be such an *** about your disagreement."
First, we've already had one mod intervention for name-calling. We don't need another.
And I'm not trying to be. And if you choose to define not agreeing with you in a blunt and forthright manner as being that way, the problem is entirely yours.
Again, you don't have to like or agree with what I say, or even how I say it.
|